The increasingly popular DevOps model – a continuous build, continuous integration, continuous deployment environment – allows applications to be rolled out more rapidly, including updates and fixes, on the fly, in a live production environment. Many, such as HIPAA and FREPA, are vague in terms of defining specific requirements for compliance, making it difficult for businesses to understand their exposure, understand what controls are required, implement those controls, and be able to prove their existence and effectiveness.Ĭloud computing certainly can help increase efficiency around application development and deployment. In fact, regulations, themselves, add to the complexity of maintaining compliance while updating applications. The real difficulty is that this constant change mode can inadvertently create security holes if care isn’t taken and, the complexity and today’s applications, devices, and networks only add to the challenge, and time-to-market needs can often be in direct conflict with compliance and regulatory requirements.
XNXX GAY CREAMPIE CASERO PATCH
For better or worse, that typically means security takes a back seat, because of a need to constantly upgrade, update, and patch applications and services. Rather, businesses are charged with keeping pace with the market, including both competitive offers and customer demands. It’s not that companies intentionally disregard security needs. ViaWest, for instance, provides managed security to some 80 percent of its cloud portfolio (a large percentage of the remainder have some level of involvement with security products and services on their own). “There isn’t anything inherently more or less secure about cloud it’s just a different way of deploying.”įor providers that include managed security services in their cloud offerings, the conversation is likely to be even easier, as they have a direct partnership between their cloud and security operations. “The cloud is as secure as your applications and your deployment capabilities and your architecture are,” says Jason Carolan, CTO at ViaWest. The cloud merely acts as a facility for accessing those applications and services. Today, many of the security holes, while possibly opening up in the cloud, tend to be a result of the persistent use of HTTP and HTTPS acting as gateways to other services and opening up access to unwanted traffic. That view, however, exhibited lack of experience and understanding, rather than any innate cloud characteristic. It wasn’t long ago that cloud adoption was being stunted by fear and lack of trust – the cloud is not secure, said many. Again a testament to some level of maturation in the market, the conversation is less about the lack of security in a cloud environment, and more about understanding the end-to-end security requirements based on business needs and processes. Still, the increase in activity shows progress is being made, and that at least some businesses are doing more to understand their current risk and exposure levels. There’s real latent risk in that nobody really understands what the current state or the “normal” or “good” state of data and infrastructure is anymore. Corporate networks and systems are attacked every day the question is, how long does it take to recognize the exposure. It’s not necessarily the events themselves, but what’s been left behind in systems, or what hasn’t yet been detected that can somehow be exploited, that poses the greater threat. “We see an uptick in requests when things like Heartbleed happen, asking us what we have done to address the threat,” acknowledges Jason Carolan, CTO at ViaWest. Perhaps it’s fortunate, at least, that when major, serious threats, like Heartbleed or POODLE strike, or when major businesses, like Sony or Target ( News - Alert), are hacked, security suddenly takes on a new face – one of greater urgency and sensitivity, as businesses instantly show concern over the safety of their corporate data. Until recently, the answer you were likely to get from anyone but a true security expert was, “Sure, I am secure – here’s the firewall,” exhibiting a lack of understanding of threats and exposure. In fact, under normal conditions, talking potential security risks is an exercise in futility, because every business has appropriate and sufficient security measures in place. Yet, if you ask security vendors or look at survey data, most enterprises aren’t taking the steps necessary to protect their infrastructure or their data as well as they should. According to the majority of IT executives, security is a key ongoing concern.